Evaluation and Assessment (E&A) is the part of Institutional Research and Evaluation (IR&E) responsible for research on teaching and learning at St. Olaf College. Our purpose is to gather and share information that supports effective adademic decision-making and strengthens student learning. We collaborate with Institutional Research (the other part of IR&E), the Office of the Provost and Dean of the College, academic departments and programs, the Center for Innovation in the Liberal Arts, and individual faculty and staff.
E&A Webpages
Evaluation and Assessment staff support:
- The improvement of student learning through mission-driven,
meaningful, and manageable assessment
- Instructional improvement through effective course
evaluations;
- Thoughtful evaluation of teaching in reviews for
tenure, promotion, and other appointments;
- Effective department and program planning through
program review;
- Successful grant-funded initiatives through well-designed
grant project evaluation;
- High-quality research projects in the scholarship of teaching
through advice on survey
design and data collection;
Other St. Olaf Webpages
- About St. Olaf
- St. Olaf
Guiding Documents
- Office of Institutional
Research and Evaluation (IR&E) (parent office of E&A)
- Institutional Research
(partner with E&A in the Office of IR&E)
- Institutional Review
Board (IRB) for Human Subjects Protection
- Office of the Provost
and Dean of the College
- Center for Innovation
in the Liberal Arts (CILA)
Information for departments and programs Dean’s request for gathering evidence about student learning Form for reporting selected ILO and strategies – Due November 24 (click here to open in word) Compilation of selected ILOs and strategies (internal use only) Ideas for department-level assessment Guidelines for assessment grants to departments and programs |
Can St. Olaf students make good arguments? Insights from selected assessment results (Internal Access Only) |
CALL and Response: Improving Students’ Ability to Make Effective Arguments This grant-funded project is intended to help us make systematic improvements in our students' ability to make effective arguments - to sift through evidence, evaluate its relevance, significance, and credibility, and put it together into a clear and convincing case for a course of action or a point of view. |
Student evaluations in reappointment, renewal, and repeated term reviews Information about Student Evaluations of Teaching in Comprehensive Reviews: College Policies, Sampling, Writing Questions, and Surveying Students. |
| Tenure and Promotion Handbook and Calendar Practical suggestions and recommended timelines for preparing dossiers for tenure and promotion candidacies. |

